Love.Story.
.Sunday, January 20, 2008 ' 11:00 PM

Determined.

I am thinking of doing podcast. Haha. Like quite fun leh. :)
Reminder: Go and find out how to do.

I give up on photoshop, also don't know what to do with it.

I brought my favorite chair back to hall, so comfortable, can almost sleep in it. Haha! :)
No la, its suppose to aid my studies cause the chair that KE provides is very uncomfortable.

Jays concert just ended. :( Nv get to see. My friend say it is fantastic. Hmph. Nvm, 2 yrs later than go also can. For now it will be BOOKS! (bleh)

PC1325 is horrendously difficult. But I think it is very interesting. I just learned how to explain the following question.

If you are standing in a moving MRT and you jump straight up, why do you land back on the same spot since when you jump up, you are in the air and the train is moving forward. So logically you would land at a different spot right?

Answ: Because due to he concept of relativity. The moving train is the frame of reference to the person inside, to the person jumping the space inside the moving train is a fixed frame of reference. SO when he jumps straight up he should have landed on the same spot as if he was jumping on normal ground. However, some people might land away from the original spot mainly due to putting a forward force when they jump or that the train is not travelling at uniform velocity. The latter is usually negligible because between the time that you jump and land about (2sec~3sec) ,the train would be traveling at uniform velocity and hence you would not move from the same spot or move minimally.


SOme crazy people ask crazy questions and some even more crazy people are able to answer the crazy questions let me show you an example. I am so dead already.

consider a electron, it has location, rotation, momentum,etc

we can describe it with a N dimension vector with each dimension

representing one of the above qualities. obviously N is small for a

electron but big for a cat. just imagine in a 1000 dimensional space, the

dot product of two 5-dimensional subspace vectors is likely to be 0 : the

probability for the 5 non-zero coordinates to meet 955 0s is much

larger than to meet with the other 5 non-zeros. that's what i mean

by most likely to be orthognal.

there are 2 ways to deal with your problem, both need to sacrifice

some basic propoties of the classical view of the universe. anyway

local realism does not exist.

if we sacrifice locality, Einstein's relativity and ignore the idea that nothing

travels faster than light, then your experiment can be explained

by some "hiden variable theory"---- this is to give up the world to

save a photon

if we sacrifice realism and accept any of the quantum mechanics point

of view, then we dont have a problem at all because before we do our

measurement, the photon does not exist, talking about its path is meaningless

it can simultaneously choose any path and it is at any path at the same time


This is crazy, how can anyone who doesn't know physics know this much!


I still Love you, you know?



Myself

Dee Bloger


Wee Lee, Age 22, Aries, 10th April
Emo in pain
I have com so far yet it seems I am still on the same spot......
Contact Info

Nesta_gwl@hotmail.com
Loves

I don't know what is love, I have lost faith in it.....
Hates

Hate? I hate no one but myself.
Wishes

Do I have even have the courage to wish?

Archives

Happy Memories

January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008

Tagboard

Chatters


Tagboard by Tag-Board.Org
Name:

URL or Email:

Message [Smilies]:

,

Darlinks

Exits

Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Thank you;s

Designer : stupidxxidiot™
XO